Am Fri, 6 Oct 2023 14:30:24 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org>:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 01:02:47PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > I am using lyx2.3 and lyx2.4 in parallel installed. The problem will > > > > arise on > > > > installing lyx2.5 later. > > > > > > > > Installing without using the suffix should be no problem for you (e.g. > > > > no change) > > > > My proposal would rename it to "LyX.metainfo.xml". > > > > > > > > > > This conflict is, I believe, also present in autoconf builds. The > > > default there is to build without suffix. If I move to cmake for > > > openSUSE packages, it's very likely I will continue to build without > > > suffix. > > > > > > Cor > > > > > > > Sure, good for you. But not for my use case. > > It's not exactly great idea to ship differently named metainfo files > when using autoconf vs cmake. > Did you have at least investigated the implications of stripping org.lyx. > prefix in the default case? > > Pavel I was not planing to strip that part. The propose was an example. Plan is: If lyx with cmake is configured with -DLYX_PROGRAM_SUFFIX:BOOL=ON the built executables have all a suffix. Only in this case should the rename happen. org.lyx.LyX.metainfo.xml -> org.lyx.LyX2.4.metainfo.xml In all other cmake-settings no rename is planed. Kornel
pgpSn8cLFZyuH.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel