Thank you! The original line of code I found was the correct one after all, it's just that my modifications caused an msbuild (due to an unused variable), but msbuild was couloring the error message in the same colour as warnings and didn't stop the build immediately, so I didn't actually notice it hadn't recompiled LyX at all.
Personally I found right clicking the "tab" (or whatever it is that shows the label of the inset) to be the obvious way to change an inset settings, and so I never would have considered that a "bug". If I have time later, I may modify the code that does the > 50 check to actually count properly, as it's counting context menu items that don't even show up. Or you could just make the number much larger than 50. I've personally not had a context menu in LyX that was too long, but users with higher DPI's/lower resolutions might have problems. (for example if I right click the menu bar I get a context menu with 49 items! but my screen could probably fit 6 more). — Isaac Oscar Gariano ________________________________ From: lyx-devel <lyx-devel-boun...@lists.lyx.org> on behalf of Jürgen Spitzmüller <jspi...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, 30 October 2023 9:41 PM To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org <lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org> Subject: Re: Is hiding stuff behind the "more" sub-context menu intentional? Am Montag, dem 30.10.2023 um 03:48 +0000 schrieb Isaac Oscar Gariano: > Sorry for bothering you again, I'm just curious if this is an > intentional design decision as it's really annoying me. It's the result of a bug fix: https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10370 Here's the respective change: https://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/6c4afc1ccb9030/lyxgit -- Jürgen -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
