Le 30/01/2026 à 21:27, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I do not think that I broke something else. But of course it would be
interesting to know.
I gave it a try, but I get the following when opening one of my files:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/15/../../../../include/c++/15/bits/stl_vector.h:1370: reference
std::vector<lyx::Row::Element>::back() [_Tp = lyx::Row::Element, _Alloc =
std::allocator<lyx::Row::Element>]: Assertion '!this->empty()' failed.
Would this be termed "an STL assertion" ?
Indeed. This should be fixed now in the branch. Note however that I can
also crash LyX by browsing the UserGuide. I'll look at it ASAP.
I have a very untechnical question for you all: currently, I use the
term 'breakable insets' to describe the insets that can be handled.
Trouble is, they become "broken insets", which is unfortunate. I thought
about inline insets, but this term is already used in opposition to
"display insets". So, what would be a catchy term that I could use instead?
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
