Re: Attempting (and failing) to compile natbib branch

[Lars Gullik Bjønnes]

Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| On Wed, 30 May 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
| 
| > On Wed, 30 May 2001, John Levon wrote:
| > > I'm not sure if that file will include additional patches from vendor.
| > > If not, they're using a totally broken optimiser. I never got a response
| > > on whether we should disable optimisation on gcc 2.96 or not ??
| 
| Actually we could perhaps provide a warning message like:
| 
|       Are you serious?  GCC-2.96 is unofficial crap!

And I still do not agree... Gcc 2.96 are working close to flawlessly
for me. And a lot better than 2.95.2...

But of course I run Gcc 2.96 will all RH patches applied.

-- 
        Lgb