On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 12:04:32AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | updated, so this is a bug (which should be fixed for 1.2.0).
>
> Perhaps... but we don't need paragraph iterators to do so.
> I realize that having paragraph iterators will be nice, and that we
> have several structures that could be converted to use iterators.
> _but_ that conversion will not happen before 1.2.0. So for now I'd
> like this fix to only traverse all the documents inset and do the
> changes where needed.
Both of the patches I sent work correctly and fix the bug.
Why do you want to fix the bug using a hack which will be removed later?
> Then we will return to the paragraph iterator approach in 1.3.0. btw.
> I am planning to get rid of the paragraph linked list, and then the
> paragraph iterators will need a completely different implementation,
> one that even might be a lot simpler.
The change would be minimal.
