* Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010823 07:00]:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 08:59:05AM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > | However I don't care how this is output on the web-page (we could maybe
> > > | have a look at the prefered language set in the browser and have a list
> > > | of date-formats and output it in the local (prefered language) mode ;)
> > >
> > > No, we should use the language of the web page.
> > >
> >
> > And that is _ENGLISH_ -- not "American".
> > And in England people write 3rd August 2001.
>
> I can't tell if this is a joke. While Americans don't get a monopoly on the
> web, there's no reason to say that we should use British spellings &
> standards either. I'd vote for the "international standard" too, FWIW.
Just to end this thread, the format is now 2001-08-32
--
Baruch Even
http://baruch.ev-en.org/
