On Sunday 02 September 2001 15:34, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | > Can you just modify buffer.C to not use tie at all, use an explicit > | > pair<> instead. > | > | Sure. If you think that that's the way to go... > > No, I don't really. But currently we use tie only in one place, and I > don't want our copy of the boost code to be (too) different from the > real boost code. > > | Patch attached. > > Can you apply it as well? Done. A
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel Angus Leeming
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel John Levon
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel Angus Leeming
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel John Levon
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel Angus Leeming
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel John Levon
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel Michael Schmitt
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel Angus Leeming
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel Angus Leeming
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel Angus Leeming
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel Michael Schmitt
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel John Levon
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel Andre Poenitz
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel John Levon
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel Michael Schmitt
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel John Levon
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel Angus Leeming
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel John Levon
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel Angus Leeming
- Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel John Levon