On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 05:11:34PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> I'll try, but I suppose I lost the patch myself. > > Was it supposed to be functionally equivalent to the old code?
Completely. It was mainly whitespace stuff, some common code put into a seperate function and a split of the old 'Thing * pop()' method into 'Thing * top() and void pop()' methods. > I see the leaks in purify, but what it does not tell me is when > contact with these paragraphs has been lost. [I think the paragraph list is a mess... Well...] Andre' -- André Pönitz .............................................. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
