On Tuesday 11 December 2001 12:49 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 12:48:43PM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > One question: why does \cal work as well as \mathcal, but \frak does not
work
> > as an alternative to \mathfrak?
>
> I guess nobody told me about its existence.
>
> The relationship of \frak to \mathfrak seems to be different ithan teh one
> of \cal to \mathcal? Is \frak just an alias for \mathfrak?
I think so. See page 218 of Goosens et al.
Incidentally, what package do I need to include to get the DVI output to
\mathfrak? I'm getting
! Undefined control sequence.
l.17 \mathcal{A}A\mathcal{A}\mathfrak
{A}\]
with the attached file.
Angus
#LyX 1.2 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 220
\textclass article
\language english
\inputencoding auto
\fontscheme default
\graphics default
\paperfontsize default
\papersize Default
\paperpackage a4
\use_geometry 0
\use_amsmath 0
\use_natbib 0
\use_numerical_citations 0
\paperorientation portrait
\secnumdepth 3
\tocdepth 3
\paragraph_separation indent
\defskip medskip
\quotes_language english
\quotes_times 2
\papercolumns 1
\papersides 1
\paperpagestyle default
\layout Standard
\begin_inset Formula \[
\mathcal{A}A\mathcal{A}\mathfrak{A}\]
\end_inset
\the_end
