>>>>> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 11:14:06AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Dekel> wrote: Can we change the code in FontLoader.C so it will look Dekel> for the symbol font only in adobe-fontspecific encoding ? >> This is the forst solution I though about. But this will not find >> the microsoft symbol ttf font, which is -microsoft-symbol or >> whatever. But maybe we don't care. >> >> Shall I do that in 1.2.0 and 1.1.6? Dekel> Does this font has the same glyphs as the adobe symbol fonts? Dekel> Even if you have this font, lyx might not use it since it Dekel> choose the first symbol font it finds. Yes, it looks like a drop-in replacement for adobe symbol (like arial is a drop in replacement for helvetica). Dekel> At least for 1.2.0, we don't need to care much since the Dekel> preferred way is to use the latex symbol fonts. What should be done to have these fonts avaliable under X? I do not have them by default here. JMarc