Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 05:43:46PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > >>But a better option is to use \boldsymbol from amsmath.sty, >>or even better, \bm from bm.sty >> > > Does this fit well into the new font stuff? > Should I just add a 'LM_TC_BM' to MathTextCodes? \boldmath is available without any additional package, but is a very old command. when using amsmath it's much more better to write \mathversion{bold} .... mathstuff .... \mathversion{normal} when you want to have a whole formula in bold. The "standard" way for single characters in amsmath is \mathbf{} or \boldsymbol{}. The last one needs package amsbsy. Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Andre Poenitz
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Angus Leeming
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Andre Poenitz
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Angus Leeming
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Dekel Tsur
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Andre Poenitz
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Angus Leeming
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Herbert Voss
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Andre Poenitz
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Andre Poenitz
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Herbert Voss
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Dekel Tsur
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Andre Poenitz
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Herbert Voss
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Andre Poenitz
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Dekel Tsur
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Angus Leeming
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Andre Poenitz
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note John Levon
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Angus Leeming
- Re: Two crashes, mathed and note Angus Leeming