On 17-Jan-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| I could think that we could use this "Empty" or IMO "Dummy" would be better
>| for LaTeX too and it should also be in ALL textclasses AND it should be as
>| the "Standard" a fixed number (we can do this if we force this 2 Layout's to
>| be present in all text-classes!)
>
> We surely do not want 'dummy' anything. First of all it is stupid.
> second it does not convey what it is.
Well did you read the rest of the mail and the conclusions I made ;)
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
When you are about to die, a wombat is better than no company at all.
-- Roger Zelazny, "Doorways in the Sand"
