On 17-Jan-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >| I could think that we could use this "Empty" or IMO "Dummy" would be better >| for LaTeX too and it should also be in ALL textclasses AND it should be as >| the "Standard" a fixed number (we can do this if we force this 2 Layout's to >| be present in all text-classes!) > > We surely do not want 'dummy' anything. First of all it is stupid. > second it does not convey what it is.
Well did you read the rest of the mail and the conclusions I made ;) Jug -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._ Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253 I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._ When you are about to die, a wombat is better than no company at all. -- Roger Zelazny, "Doorways in the Sand"