Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> - buffer << word.str() << "\n";
>> - word.str("");
>> + buffer << "\n";
>> + last_word_length = 0;
>
| Well this patch will most probably fail to work. The word is needed to make
| a good linebreak algorithm and break the lines on aproximately linelen. So
| in the above word may contain a string which was not yet written to the
| buffer AND we have to write it to the buffer only AFTER we could check for
| it's lenght!
well yes... _but_ that is not absolutely true I guess...
I think we can have an algorithm that is almost as good without the
word stringstream complexity.
(and the best would be to have a lyxasciistreambuf...)
--
Lgb
