Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars> | On 05-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, in part. Having control over this is good. And the compile
>>>> time factor is pretty important too on my p2-366/128M laptop I use
>>>> here (of course, it is less annoying on my p4-1.7G at home...).
>>>
| Lars> | Well to tell you the truth I gave up working at home on lyx.
| Lars> It takes too | long to compile the sources on my P3-450/256M.
| Lars> When I have 1 hour of time | to do something, cvs update make
| Lars> takes 40 minutes well and on the 20 mins | left I have time to
| Lars> open 2 source files!
>
| Lars> This is a result of us having too large classes and too large
| Lars> include files. This then results in too much needing a recompile
| Lars> almost always...
>
| And do you really think there is a possiblity to really lower these
| times (knowing that bloat will have a positive drift in the same
| timeframe)?
Yes, I do belive so. We have a lot of bloat right now, and a lot of
badly "designed" classes and inheritance trees.
--
Lgb
