On Monday 13 May 2002 5:28 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: > > > > These are now the patches up for consideration, > > Id like to know which ones are tested and working, and also absolutely > > needed in 1.2.0. Several of these also miss a Changelog. > > - keepvert.patch > - whbug.patch > > are both not critical and tested by others. > > Herbert
Is there any reason why my insetcite patch, now tested by several people, isn't included in your list? Angus