On Monday 13 May 2002 5:28 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
> >
> > These are now the patches up for consideration,
> > Id like to know which ones are tested and working, and also absolutely
> > needed in 1.2.0. Several of these also miss a Changelog.
>
> - keepvert.patch
> - whbug.patch
>
> are both not critical and tested by others.
>
> Herbert

Is there any reason why my insetcite patch, now tested by several people, 
isn't included in your list?

Angus

Reply via email to