>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> We are not using those compilers to tune the binary size of lyx. Lars> That is just as using a lyx compiled without optimization for Lars> profiling. I do not think most people use gcc 3.x to compile lyx. And mind you, the people wit `older' compilers are also the people who have older hardware and would appreciate a small binary. And I am talking +50% increase here, not a small drift. You references compilers are (1) gcc 3.1 which was released a couple weeks ago and (2) gcc 3.2 which is not released. Unless you plan lyx 1.3.0 to be available in more than one year, this is not reasonable. JMarc
