On Friday 07 June 2002 9:19 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Woo hoo! I have a decent compiler again! > | > | As for the warnings, there are thousands of em, especially in the boost > | code! there are also some errors about stuff that's now in namespace std, > | but that's by the by. > | > | However, these two warnings might prove important given the recent angst > | with boost::functions. I haven't investigated at all of course... > > ... but is the warnings really valid... > > > result_type operator()(BOOST_FUNCTION_PARMS) const > { > assert(!this->empty()); > > policy_type policy; > policy.precall(this); > > internal_result_type result = invoker(function_base::functor > BOOST_FUNCTION_COMMA > BOOST_FUNCTION_ARGS); > > policy.postcall(this); > #ifndef BOOST_NO_VOID_RETURNS > return static_cast<result_type>(result); > #else > return result; > #endif // BOOST_NO_VOID_RETURNS > }
Well, I guess that depends on what you mean by "valid". Here BOOST_NO_VOID_RETURNS is NOT defined and result_type is void, so we have static_cast<void>(result); Personally, I think that the compiler is being pretty smart to spot that the result is being thrown away! Angus