Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I just wondered: Why is it sensible to have the dispatch switches in each
| inset?
>
| As far as I can tell, the same functionality can achieved by virtual
| functions for individual LFUNs and a single big switch in the inset base
| class.
>
| The only disadvantage I see is that we'll have 100+ additional member
| functions in the base class (which is certainly not Nice), but the total
| effort should be about the same.
Do we really want any of those approces?
Wouldn't a system where the "insets" register LFUNS with the
dispatcher (which we would only need one of) be better?
--
Lgb
