On wtorek 13 sierpień 2002 02:28 pm, John Levon wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 08:24:11PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 08:22:29PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > > But you don't have to fiddle with dialogs to be of help with GUIi. > > > > But that's what is missing in the Qt port, isn't it. > > No. (well, yes). One thing that is still a major obstacle is a decent > menu backend that Qt can use. Maybe not particularly exciting but the > last 10% rarely is > > Another REALLY boring thing that needs doing is splitting up the math > symbol xbm's in to per-symbol xpms so that Qt can use them sensibly > (then we have math toolbar - ta da)
Wouldn't it be possible to do that at runtime? Load the big thing, paint cropped parts into a pixmap, and you seem to be done. That way the (quite reasonable) idea of panels is preserved. I love the panels. Now I'm not a LyX developer so I'd better be quiet. it's just that *me* thinks they are easier to manage than gazillions of individual icons/buttons. Cheers, Kuba Ober
