Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wednesday 14 August 2002 11:03 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> I think this is a step in the right direction, and it is surely not >> worse than the thingie I did. > | Sure, but I think that the implementation is horrible. A huge amount of | replicated code. I thought of a much more elegant approach. Try this:
It looks better.
| Ahhh. I'd forgotten about that. Did you manage to isolate the problem and
| tell boost the list about it?
No.
--
Lgb
