Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 12:04:47AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | On Friday 16 August 2002 2:19 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> | > On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 01:57:32PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> | > > So we would lose lazy construction.
>> | >
>> | > What was this good for anyway? To reduce startup time?
>> |
>> | Conceptual elegance? Reducing compile times? Lars knows.
>>
>> Just back from a wonderfull weekend at the west coast of Norway; what
>> does Lars know?
>
| People say Lars should know what lazy dialog construction is good for.
| My guess was better startup times, Angus thought of "conceptual elegance".
Or memory footprint...
--
Lgb
