On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 06:25:32PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote:
 
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

...

> | Martin> Sorry, I give up. If it's only as little as 10%, and you
> | Martin> actually know how to, why don't *you* do it?
> |  
> | Don't pay too much attention to what Allan says. Nobody does :)

Actually I think he is right... only I don't think it is nearly as easy
as he implies. And my C++ skills being what they are, see my tail droop.

I'd *love* him to take up the challenge...

> I won't say "no", but I do agree with Allan.
> 
> I really think that a proper InsetSectioning is the right way to go,

Perhaps... but don't you thinks it's too heavy guns? I kind of like the
\layout Section, but somehow we should get a *clean* way of having an
inset hardwired to the start of a paragraph (and yes, it ought to have
been the section number... I just didn't manage that. Allan if you do, 
I would love to see it.)

A dirty fix for now would be to put code on the menu emitting a sequence
"begin-paragraph; option-insert;" (pseudocode). 

> but I also realize that we will not be able to get anyone to do that
> work now. So I will go with the patch "as-is". Sure we might get some
> compability problems later, but we have handled a lot more severe
> compability stuff earlier (pextra stuff.../ ert ...)
> 
> On a side one... one of the huge problems with LyXText today is all
> the hardcoded "labels", to be able to generalize that code at put it
> into layout files would be really, really great.

Hmmm tell me about it :-(
 
> -- 
>       Lgb

Martin 

Attachment: msg43343/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to