For others that are as easily ammused as I am, I'm including spam assassin's tagging of my bug report. Real spam rarely hits 7.3 . . .
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:12:51PM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: > SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ---------------------- > SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered > SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. > SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. > SPAM: > SPAM: Content analysis details: (7.3 hits, 5 required) > SPAM: CALL_NOW (4.7 points) BODY: Urges you to call now > SPAM: WEIRD_PORT (0.3 points) URI: Uses non-standard port number for HTTP > SPAM: PORN_3 (0.5 points) Uses words and phrases which indicate porn (3) > SPAM: NO_MX_FOR_FROM (1.8 points) No MX records for the From: domain > SPAM: > SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results --------------------- <gdb output and included files snipped>
