On Thursday 05 September 2002 3:22 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Thursday 05 September 2002 3:12 pm, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> | > On Thursday 05 September 2002 15:00, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > > Hmm da hmm I have some counters stuff to look at first,
> | > > but after that... please somebody beat me to it...
> | >
> | > Should we replace the COPYING reference with the explicit note?
> |
> | Well it's dead easy to do: just modify the script. But personally I quite
> | like the fact that all this copyright notice stuff is in one place too.
> |
> | My philosophy is, we try not to replicate code unnecessarily, so why
> | replicate blurb?
>
> So that a file taken out of context (i.e. lyx) still has the license
> information.
Then add a line from the old style headers:
This file is part of LyX, the document processor.
It is GPL-ed code.
See the file COPYING or www.lyx.org/COPYING for details
Angus
