Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 22 Oct 2002, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
|
| [...]
|
| > Lars> Is the need for lyxstring that _real_?
| >
| > Lars> the last months should imply that it is not.
| >
| > I have not compiled 1.3.0cvs on my tru64 station for ages (I do it on
| > linux because the machine is faster).
|
| I haven't compiled or even updated 1.3.0cvs since early August because
| I simply do not have the room for two compiled LyX trees anymore -- in
| fact I can barely fit a compiled 1.3.0cvs and a maintainer-cleaned
| 1.2.x. I used to be able to fit both compiled trees when I could use
| lyxstring for both. However, as there are now a number of reports of
| daily use of 1.3.0 being successful I'll risk switching to using
| 1.3.0cvs for my thesis and keep my fingers crossed.
|
| Allan. (ARRae)
|
| P.S. You still haven't answered the `du -s` question for your many
| trees (std::string vs lyxstring).
du -s build/src/lyx qt/src/lyx string/src/lyx
67692 build/src/lyx
82380 qt/src/lyx
63820 string/src/lyx
du -sh build qt string
368M build
468M qt
351M string
Seems that the only benefit with lyxstring now is faster compiles...
(I am currently checking that as well)
--
Lgb
