Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | What would be nice is to have an rpm for some kind of vanilla rh 7.x. | I fear that rh6.2+gcc2.96 is asking for trouble. If we assume that | people can just rebuild their rpm (which is not so easy since they | need to have all the -devel packages installed), I think we should | just decide so and get rid of the rh62 rpms we have currently. They | are probably too confusing for people.
I have the new aussie up and running now, but I need to do some setup first... then it would be a breeze to create rpm's for RH-8.0 -- Lgb