On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 06:47:45PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> > What Qt version ? The patch doesn't make any sense because the signal is
>
> qt-3.0.5. Wouldn't know if it makes sense, but I believe you. The only think
> I want to add is that it works (no more run-time error, insertion of
> symbols work as expected)
But your patch alone breaks Qt 2 since the signals and connects no
longer match. I have committed your patch plus the extra fixes, I hope
it works (don't forget anon cvs is delayed ...)
> Aren't 'string const &' and 'const string &' equivalent C++-wise? Sorry
> about my ignorance.
Yes, but moc isn't C++
> { 0, &static_QUType_ptr, "const string&", QUParameter::In }
> };
> static const QUMethod signal_0 = {"button_clicked", 1, param_signal_0 };
> static const QMetaData signal_tbl[] = {
> { "button_clicked(const string&)", &signal_0, QMetaData::Public }
> };
so it looks like it was mangling it ... ineresting
--
"There's only millions that lose their jobs and homes and sometimes accents
There's only millions that die in their bloody wars, it's alright
It's only their lives and the lives of their next of kin that they are losing
It's only their lives and the lives of their next of kin that they are losing."
- Stereolab
