On Wednesday 18 December 2002 3:45 pm, Kuba Ober wrote: > Would it make any sense to use something like this: > typedef uint16_t lchar_t; > typedef std::basic_string<lchar_t> lstring; > > "l" stands for LyX (or low-overhead-in-conversion-to-QString) ;-)
SMiyata (sp?) suggested something similar to this some time ago when describing what CJK-LyX needed before the two codes could be merged. He noted that wchar_t is shot on several different platforms. -- Angus
