On środa 18 grudzień 2002 11:17 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 05:07:58PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > That its encoding is not standarized? > > is it 16bit or 32 bit? > > > > problems like that... > > Ok, I thought it was safe to assuem 32 bits there. In anycase, I agree that > 32 bit is the target. Would make mathed slimmer as most symbols could be > encoded as a 'character'...
Oh, mathed. Right. That's a useful reason. I agree. Now, the question is whether wouldn't there be enough space in ucs2 to put tex symbols into. This is going to be lyx-specific anyway, so I don't see any problems there. I believe we can find a few (2? 3?) free pages in ucs2 to put tex symbols... Cheers, Kuba Ober
