On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:41:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | I've played around with it a bit more and it seems to be working. > | > | So please have a look. Getting rid of Inset::update() seems to be a good > | idea somehow... > > Let's do it like this: > > - Let John apply the clone patch
No problem. The length of my right leg is unfortunately limited... [Is the "clone patch" the same thing he send to the list this morning (last night?)] > - you create a new rediffed patch for us to look at/test [I doubt this touches the same code at all. It's basically 'commenting out all InsetFoo::update() implementations and all calls to Inset:update and add a call to Inset::metrics() in the rowpainter'.] > - we report back > - you (do not) commit. Ok. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
