On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 05:10:42PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Could somebody please have a look?
I agree with the rationale behind the patch absolutely. Any multiple BV stuff should only happen when it can be done *cleanly*. Therefore removing this abortive attempt is a really good idea in terms of us understanding the code. > Aehm: Things to look for are basically hard crashs. All of the update() > macinery is still in place and should not be affected at all. Optimistic as always I see. update is strongly affected since you removed the bit that doesn't do the update if the text is in use. Whether any bugs are introduced I don't know, but it needs really careful testing regards john
