Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 10:23:19AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 01:58:46AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > This patch introduces namespace lyx::insets. both xforms and qt are
| > | > handled.
| > |
| > | Couldn't we settle for a flat 'lyx' namespace?
| >
| > I'd really, really rather not.
| >
| > Once we have all code changed to be in lyx and subnamespaces the
| > hassle will also be less than it is right now.
|
| I hope you are right...
|
| > Also the use of subnamespaces makes it f.ex. possible to move
| > Inset::Code out of Inset and to reside in lyx::insets directly.
|
| lyx::InsetCode would do for me personally.
with lyx::insets::Code you could use just Code in a lot of places.
| But hey, everybody has his pets...
right.
| It's just this 'there might be more important things out there'
| feeling.
Well... it seems that I am the only one using time on this one so...
| What about the InsetText changes for instance? [State-of-the-art in the
| current BRANCH_NOUPDATE]
ok ok ok... I will try to make room for testing that.
--
Lgb
