John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 08:32:44AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: | | > | On an ideal world, I don't see the point of the lyx:: namespace. | > | > except when used to protect against our own pollution of the global | > namespace. | | For example ? When the LyX code has some clients maybe, but until then | we have only to deal with the platform's namespace
Note that lyx is also its own client.
--
Lgb
