On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 12:07:18PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > Most notably, the 'fill' computation could be merged with the > 'rowBreakPoint' stuff as it alomost does the same thing. This way > only half of the width() calls would be needed...
If you go anywhere near row-breaking please make dooubly sure not to break it. A good test is lots of deep itemize lists with large words etc. regards john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
