On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:11:56AM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
> next_row()->pos() - 1 should be replaced by row.end() nowadays.
>
> By construction, these values should be equal (id existent):
>
> for (pos_type z = 0; z < pit->size() + 1; ) {
> Row row(z);
> z = rowBreakPoint(pit, row) + 1;
> row.end(z);
> ...
> }
>
>
> Andre'Andre', would you please fix this? If it's up to me, it won't happen until late afternoon/evening (real life asserting itself again) - Martin
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
