On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 12:15:51PM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote: > IMO, we should separate the concept of 'iterator' from that of > 'cursor'. I believe that this is Andr�'s view too.
Hm yes. But a cursor is not much more than one or two iterators (for the selection anchor...), and not a completely different idea... > (Witness his occassional comments that the math cursor is a hack.) > Implement the cursor using the position iterator, by all means, but > enable search and replace to create its own position iterator as and > when it needs it. That's the way I'd like to implemnent it. Andre'
