John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 03:36:40PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > >> Just for your enjoyment. > | I heard that b::f only allows portably-named pathnames by default. Is | this true ?
This is the very reason why I have not pushed harder for b::f.
| How do we deal with it ??
use fs::path(..., native)
(and hack our version of fs to use that as default perhaps...)
(this is mostly regulating what chars are allowed in a file/dir name)
--
Lgb
