Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:49:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj�nnes > | wrote: >>> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>> | Conceptually there is only one 'target x position' per >>> | BufferView, not one per inset. And the LyXCursors used for >>> | selection have not been using their x_fix at all. >>> > >>> | Small step towards cursor globalization. [Finally we'd have one >>> | 'real' cursor per bv] >>> >>> Can we rename the x_fix? >>> >>> x_remembered or something? >> > | x_target? > > Perhaps... or even a longer (cumbersome name) > > next_xpos_target... > > next_x_target... > > almost anyting is better than x_fix.
Since all other BufferView data members are in the Pimpl, shouldn't this go in there too? -- Angus
