On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 12:45:14PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > >> Compiling. Note that we should anyway assert on "no rows", be cause "no > >> rows" means "no position information at all" so the checkInsetHit call > >> would be completely bogus. > > > > No, it means 'no _internal_ position information'. > > ... what about the inset size? Height in particular.
Ah... that's what you mean. Ok, for this we need rows. And we should have them as the inset must have been drawn before we could click inside... So an ASSERT would be ok in this case. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
