On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 02:54:14PM -0300, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > no, the parent-relative position of the inset depends on it's own size *and* > other insets sizes at the same level (moreover, before *and* after it), and
Why after ? I can't think of a case (well, tables, but that's all in one inset and can be handled as such) > it's computed by the parent. Furthemore, the absolute position is not known > until the end. Why ? If I start at the top, then inset + 1 can know its absolute position surely, since all insets before have been calculated. regards john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
