On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 02:18:35PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > > I don't think that this is any better/may well be impossible to encode. > > Have a go. > > Ugh. You convinced me (I understand near to nothing about qt). Alternatively > we can also solve it only for the ones that really need it.
Um, I thought I had already done that. What has changed since I introduced the reject() in the necessary places ? regards john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
