On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 10:34:16PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:12:13PM +0100, Andre Poenitz spake thusly: > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:14:58PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > >> > It sure does help... pretty it is not. > >> > > >> > Does it make sense to check this in (attached)? > >> > >> Well, I certainly don't like it, but if it is the only way to get this > >> code past 2.95, just do it. > >> > >> > - BOOST_ASSERT(cur.inset() == this); > >> > + BOOST_ASSERT(cur.inset() == const_cast<MathNestInset *>(this)); > >> > >> [But at least mind your spacing...] > >> > >> Andre' > > > | It's in -- with corrected spacing. > > All this is just so super ugly that I cannot fathom why all other > compilers than 2.95 has to suffer by this.
Well, you could as well decide that 2.95 is off the 'supported' list now. [I personally wouldn't care now] > IMHO const_cast is the wrong fix. even a ptr_cmp function would have > been better... I could live with that, too. The const_cast is indeed very ugly. Andre'
