Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: >> I think that it is fair to say that CG was hacking the xforms >> sources to get something useable. Given that I acted as >> 'consultant' to this hack and given that my knowledge of X is >> minimal, I'm amazed that the thing got off the ground at all. > > Angus, it was not my intention to limit CG's effort. We are just > trying to find the source of the l10n bug. So my comment was rather > a question (if that line is the error we are looking for).
I think that we have crossed wires. I didn't mean to sound touchy; I'm not. I'm just saying that I'm not surprised that you're finding bugs in this code, given the lack of real understanding behind its implementation. If the man pages say use NULL, then use NULL. If you tell CG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, then he'll be able to correct his sources too, or at least explain why he made the change. Regards, -- Angus
