Andre Poenitz wrote: > In fact, I'd prefer > >> +-----+------------------+ >> blah blah |inset| text | blah blah >> +-----+------------------+ >> blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
which leaves open the possibility to have | +-----+-----------------------------+| |blah blah |inset| box 1 || |+---------+-----+ || || box 2 box 2 box 2 box 2 box 2 box 2 box 2 || || box 2 box 2 box 2 box 2 box 2 box 2 box 2 || || +------------------------------------+| || box 3 | blah blah blah blah blah blah blah | |+--------+ | |blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah | when you move to Asger's "An inset is three boxes" model? -- Angus
