Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 10:37:30AM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote: >> and that the 'real' code handling the error is then handled in the >> main program loop. However, I don't see anyway to code that up >> without using throw/catch. > > Destructor of a static singleton?
Actually, that's not a bad idea. We already have a LyX singleton that owns (or at least could own) everything. -- Angus
