>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>>> I have problems compiling lengthcommon.C with gcc 3.2.2 and need
>>>> the attached patch. Any reason why I should not apply it?
>>
Angus> I have never had a problem with a zero byte patch...
>>  Umph.

Angus> Ahhh. No reasons why you should not apply it and every reason
Angus> why you should. I'd even go one step further and define
Angus> num_units as

Done.

JMarc

Reply via email to