Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote: >>> wasn't that "status" in wone widget, and input and info in another >>> widget? >> > | Sorry, I don't follow you. I thought that the idea was for a > | widget to show feedback on and for a widget to input commands in. >> > | What's your vision? > > Two visible widgets (like emacs): 1. status info 2. the minibuffer. > > if the internal implementation for 2 is two stacked widgets that is > ok.
So (screenshot attached) you picture is that 1 (status info) is displaying 'GNU emacs' 2 (minibuffer) is currently displaying 'For information about the GNU Project'. Right? Whereas in John's implentation both 'GNU emacs' and 'For information about the GNU Project' would both be displayed in a single, always visible widget, whilst and commands would be input in a second, sometimes visible, sometimes hidden, widget. Personally, I prefer John's vision. -- Angus
