On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 01:22:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Since LyX is going into GUI-independence territory, can we say that some > | toolkit is 'more natural'? > > I'd say that a C++ toolkit is "more natural", other than that it > really doesn't matter...
Unfortunately there is no such thing. And no, Qt doesn't qualify as "C++ toolkit". Andre', currently fighting both Qt and Win2k full time.
