Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > It would be nice to have some testing before committing it.
I couldn't detect any problems that result from the patch. I wondered, though, why we don't introduce a general lfun "inset-next <type>" (at least for the ones with same_content = false). That would simplify the code and even let the user search for other insets via minibuffer. While testing, I have detected an independent problem: If you insert a label into an inset, it gets listed twice in the reference dialog browser (and one more time for each nesting level). Seems that it gets added to the inset list on each lyxtext level again. Regards, Jürgen
