wolfram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>
| cmon, this is really pushing me to my limits
| - you guys are supposed to be the gurus on
| lyx development - I'm just a poor user ...
If just a poor user... why do you play with optimization then?
| anyway I tried to cope with your suggestion as follows
| I compiled lyx-1.3.5 with the offending
| gcc compiler switch:
>
| CXXFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m' CFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m'
so if you change the default you are on your own. I have no idea what
you have stumbled into: compiler bug, boost bug, linker bug, lyx
bug...
If you can show that this is a lyx bug, we will surely fix it.
--
Lgb
